Spring is Here

Spring is Here

Monday 5 October 2015

Edward I Hammered Pennies

It occurred to me recently whilst looking through some of my finds that I have been fortunate to unearth over the last four years of metal detecting that I have a fair few pennies of Edward 1st, ( 12 in total) all found mainly on different permissions that I have and all of different classes and mints.

Of all the varied hammered coinage I have found, Edward seems to be one of the more common coins that keep popping up which made me wonder why this might be. My initial thought was that maybe it was just coincidence, as surely it would be more likely to find coins of the later periods than coins of some 700 plus years ago.

Prior to the 13th and 14th centuries it is possible that "coins" were more likely to be found in the hands of the wealthy and important and therefore less likely to be mislaid. Commoners person and peasants of the world would have relied on trading with a barter system, which incidentally, goes back as far as 6000BC and was introduced by Mesopotamia tribes. Goods and services would have been exchanged for all manner of things such as food, drink, weaponry etc..

The development of coinage shows the progressive change from an agricultural society to one which enjoyed more mobility and a well developed a taste for 'consumer products'. Having said that bartering would have still continued but would have become more organised with the introduction of coinage.

Talking to Rod Blunt of the UKDFD he mentioned that "The monetary economy developed rapidly in the 13th and 14th centuries. A high proportion of the medieval fairs (where currency was essential) were established during the reign of Henry III (1216-72), and many of these survived for several hundred years. Pilgrimages (for many participants the equivalent of modern-day summer vacations as missions for the truly devout ) also started to become popular at around the same time, inns providing sustenance and souvenirs ( bought and paid for in cash) were essential elements of the journey"

I wondered what kind of quantity of hammered pennies would have been in circulation at the time and my initial guess was maybe around a million or so? This seemed a fair amount of coins given how long ago we are talking? Looking in to this more closely I came across an article and I was astounded at how far out I was in my guess-timation!

The article claimed that in the re-coinage of 1279/1281 over 100 million coins were struck and in the years soon after another 60-80 million were also issued. The 1279 recoinage was largely from melting down previous short cross coinage and the 1300 coinage from melting down coins from the 1279 period that had become worn and clipped added to all the continental imitations in circulation.

There were also 4 million silver hammered farthings made but this came to an end soon after due to the coins being too small and continually being lost.


The above figures are quite staggering really when you consider this is only for the period of Edward 1st. There were allegedly over 50 million Saxon coins struck and one can only imagine how many coins were produced during the reign of all future kings and queens..

One thing this does bring to mind is that on any future detecting days out it is good to remember these figures especially when the finds may be getting a bit sparse.

Below are a few examples of the early Edwardian pennies I have found..



































Tuesday 28 July 2015

Cheques & Balances


 



Roy Aldington's account of the finding and journey of a modest, nay, humble, Tudor button through the intricacies of the Treasure Act, Portable Antiquities Scheme and Coroner's Jurisdiction, to its new, permanent home in the Chester Grosvenor Museum.



Is it just me or have you too noticed an unprecedented surge in interest in our own “beautiful game” - metal detecting? It seems to me that in recent times the most unlikely characters have taken a keen interest and embraced all things remotely rural; the stunning unfamiliar vistas, breathtaking unfamiliar exercise and retching unfamiliar farmyard smells. As if demonstrating a firm commitment to their new-found hobby many have invested heavily in state-of-the-art machines that they have yet to fathom and without having given a single thought as to where they will swing them.
  
I suppose it's not that surprising really, what with pots of gold and Viking silver being unearthed all over the place with increasing regularity, often in unheard-of places; likely by novice of remarkably little experience but who seems to be miraculously gifted in the art of standing in the right place, with their investment uncannily and precisely tuned-in. 

There have, of course, been other influences leading to this sudden interest in all things buried. BBC Four's recent television series 'Detectorists' starring Mackenzie Crook and Toby Jones will have sparked an interest in many casual viewers, especially the scenes of the goings-on at club meetings, the powerful bonding camaraderie and, well, sheer lust.

Strewth. It's almost unbelievable but even as I write there is news of the finding of yet another magnificent hoard, this time in a farmer's field near Aylesbury in Buckinghamshire; “An amateur treasure hunter, Paul Coleman,
could be in line to receive part of a £1 million pound windfall after unearthing a hoard of rare Anglo Saxon coins in a Christmas dig” (The Telegraph)....Oh, Happy Dayz!

This newly kindled interest can be simply put down to the dream, inherent in most of us I suppose, of one-day stumbling across a buried hoard, striking it rich, winning the jackpot and eventually being on the receiving end of a big fat cheque. But steady-on now, where there are cheques there has to be balances; well, to balance things-up, as it were. So what about more modest finds, those artefacts that any one of us might unearth, maybe something of significant local historical interest, yet of little commercial value but still coming within the stipulations of the Treasure Act, 1996?.

In its short existence our small team, dubbed 'Finders–Sharers', has had the good fortune to find a small number of modest precious metal artefacts that have been subject to the Act and have followed “due process”. This then, is the story of one such object, a small post-Medieval silver button. Plain but stunningly attractive, beautifully crafted, intact and worth, well – not very much actually.

It was May-Day, the sun was shining brightly and we had been let-loose in the charming garden of the old farmhouse that had its roots in the Middle-Ages and owned by the family of one of our farmer-partners. We had been relegated to the garden area because most of the fields were in crop and in the warm, humid conditions you could fairly 'hear' the plants growing.

It's true, we had real expectations for this location surrounding the ancient farm buildings, situated at what was once the busy crossroads of civilization in those darker-ages. Reality eventually set-in though when all that was forthcoming was the familiar small coinage of Victoria, Edward and the Georges; the usual domestic kitchen bric-a-brac of spoons, ladle handles and brass fittings; a few military bits and pieces from both world wars, including the best part of a Cheshire Regiment shoulder flash, minus its crest....and a well played with 'Matchbox' car of the Morris-Cowley variety.



And then, quite unexpectedly, from close to the base of the hawthorn boundary hedgerow, out popped the tiny silver button soon to be destined to the custody of our Finds Liaison Officer (FLO) for Cheshire, Merseyside and Manchester and the jurisdiction of the West Cheshire Coroner.


The Portable Antiquities Scheme FLO, Vanessa Oakden, immediately recognised that the button must be dealt with in accordance with the stipulations of the Treasure Act, 1996, so diligently recorded the find: Portable Antiquities Scheme Treasure case 2014 T302 (LVPL-1EC484), notified the Cheshire Coroner and delivered the item to the relevant curator at the British Museum in London for assessment. Of course, a detailed written receipt containing full details of the find was provided.

In her report to the Coroner, Vanessa was careful to protect the exact location of the find-site. Due to the nature of the find and the potential conservation risk (such as illicit metal detecting) she advised that publication of the find-spot should be limited in all subsequent dealings and correspondence. The Coroner,
Mr Nicholas Rheinberg, opened an Inquest to deal with circumstances of the find and adjourned it to a later date.

 
Meanwhile our humble find was assessed by the Museum's experts and Vanessa Oakden's academically stylized report for HM Coroner reads:


"A silver composite button. The object is hemispherical with a domed top which has been soldered onto a convex back-plate. On the back-plate there are two blow-holes, one on either side of a centrally placed attachment loop. Inserted into the centre of the back-plate and secured by solder is a silver strip, bent to form an attachment loop. The strip is D-shaped in cross-section. Above the attachment loop the object has been stamped with the maker's mark PP within a rectangular border.”

 
The report goes on to say that the item is not uncommon but is over 300 years old and composed of more than 10% precious metal and therefore should be considered Treasure under the terms of the Treasure Act 1996. Whoo-Hoo!


So it was that, respectfully attired, on a magnificent Autumnal October morning I attended as summoned, the Coroner's Court to be held in the West Annexe of the magnificent Warrington Town Hall, to give evidence before Mr Rheinberg, Her Majesty's Coroner for Cheshire, at the Inquest into the finding of our “little treasure”.

HM Coroner's Inquests are always formal affairs but in cases like this mostly relaxed, matter-of-fact and low-key. The circumstances of the find were simply outlined, the expert assessment noted and the outcome considered. The Coroner pronounced that the button will be deemed treasure under terms of the Treasure Act 1996 and recorded the Inquest verdict accordingly.

With business concluded, Mr Rheinberg noted that the local press were absent and this might be a good opportunity to have an informal chat about metal detecting in general and notable finds in particular, of which he is 'clued-up' and keenly interested. If, of course, I could spare the time!. 

I looked across at my wife, who sat there, still in astonished disbelief about how such incredible fuss could be made about an old lost button; given that she had previously endured endless hours of my 'riveting' metal detecting reminiscences. She smiled. The preplanned follow-on trip to Ikea and the likely-hood of Swedish style meat balls was slowly beginning to fade!.

So we had an 'off-the-record' chat and I had listed a few 'treasure' items that my buddy and me had found, when I proffered that it wasn't always valuable things that turned out to be the most interesting. I mentioned that I had recently found a couple of unusual bullet heads and subsequent research had revealed that they were specifically made for a pistol used in British Colonial escapades, the Boer War, Zulu Wars and the War of American independence. “The Tranter”, Mr Reinberg said unhesitatingly, “The Tranter, ah, the Rolls-Royce of all pistols ever made”, and he went on to display a remarkable in-depth knowledge about these things! I digress.

Throughout the treasure process the FLO and British Museum staff naturally demonstrated a high standard of administrative skills, meticulously documenting the processes and ensuring that both finder and landowner were kept up to date regarding the progress of their assessment and passage through the intricacies of the Treasure Act. From an early stage in the process they were quick to point out that the finder and landowner were at liberty to waive claim to any reward and 'gift' the find to the museum; a course of action we were reminded of at regular intervals.

The landowners are modern enlightened farmers who share our interest in the preservation of local history. When we disclosed the find to them they unhesitatingly agreed with us that the button would be donated free of charge to the Chester Grosvenor Museum. So we were well pleased to learn later that the museum wished to acquire the button at a 'fair market value'.

With this and other finds we have always found it a bit strange that the museum seeks title of the find, sometimes even before the thing has been properly assessed, identified, and given a realistic value. Still, it is understandable that the public purse should be protected and that gifts in the museum's favour should be established at the earliest opportunity, to avoid unnecessary waste of time and resources. Not that it mattered in this particular case because our decision had already been made.

Following the Inquest finding the Independent Treasure Valuation Committee commissioned an independent valuer who declared the worth of the button to be just twenty-pounds; a figure that we collectively considered significantly under par and which he, the valuer himself, hoped, “may not come as too much of a disappointment to the finder”.

No matter, because the Valuation Committee were scheduled to convene just before Christmas and our newly declared 'treasure-item' was on their list of seventy-five or so items for their expert consideration. As the 'Grosvenor' had declared an interest in acquiring the button for their display at the Chester museum, the conclave would recommend a value for purchase by the Secretary of State. They duly met, considered and, not surprisingly, agreed with the lowly valuation of twenty-quid. For our part, we magnanimously honoured our agreement to the Grosvenor Museum.



The finder of “Treasure” and equally the owner of land on which it was found, can ensure by waiving any share of reward, that such true public spirited gesture will be recognised by the Department for Minister for Culture, Media and Sport, with a signed certificate as a token of the Nation's gratitude. This sort of award definitely looks cool on the finder's and landowner's credentials but more importantly perhaps, the Treasury's meagre budget provision is spared for the public good.



 So there you have it. That is how our little 'gem' of a find was transparently and properly dealt with under due process and stipulations of the Treasure Act. Our certificates, proclaiming the fact that we have 'generously waived our claim to a reward', signed by Ed Vaizey MP, Minister for Culture and the Digital Economy, have been delivered and mine is framed and proudly displayed above the mantle-piece (no, I'm kidding, we don't have a mantle-piece).

At last, our little bit of local history is safely out of the ground, where it had lain undisturbed for more than four centuries, properly recorded for posterity and now rightly on display in its new home, Chester Grosvenor Museum, where future generations can enjoy the simple beauty of the Post-Medieval artisan’s work. By the way, can anyone out there identify the Maker's Mark PP and resolve the final conundrum?




 












 

Monday 27 July 2015

Best of July's Roundup..

If you are like me i'm sure that July has come and you are excitedly anticipating the start of the new season.. Roy and myself have had a few months of limited detectable ground and reliant on some of the pasture fields we have which have not yeilded many great finds, mainly due to the hot weather we have had and the ground being baked hard as concrete..

This month some of our favourite fields have just started to have the potatoes taken off which is good due to the fact that spuds predominantly have had a good deep plough to raise the humps of earth for the seeding. 

So on to the finds for July..

I managed to start the proceedings off on our last day on pasture with a very unexpected find of a hammered short cross penny of King John. The coin is a Class 5c and struck at the Canterbury Mint with the moneyer being Samuel. Mass dates the class 5c range for this coin is 1207-1210. Unfortunately its has seen better days and is quite worn with a crack through the coin. We have had several visits to this field in the past and it has only produced a few copper coins of the late Georgian and early Victorian era so as you can imagine this was a welcome find.
Hammered Short Cross Penny of King John
Moneyer Samuel - Mint Canterbury

 Next up was our first day back out on freshly harvested potato fields, the ground was perfect, rolled flat and very easy to dig which made things so much easier especially with the air temperature still being quite warm this time of year. Again we had been on this field a few times in the past and aside from a few obligatory musket balls and a few worn copper pennies nothing of any real substance has come from it.


James 1st Half Groat 1604-1619
Roy struck first just before our 11 o'clock coffee break calling over that he had had a find and walked over to present a small hammered silver half groat of James 1st. Again slightly worn with very little detail on it but another hammered coin now safe from the plough.

The coin is of James 1st Second Coinage which puts the date somewhere in the date range of 1604-1619

Needless to say Roy was very pleased to have got off the mark for the new season and what a great way to do it.

The next few hours saw some rain showers and a bit of ducking and diving back to the car for some food and a couple of coffees but after a few more hours and many buttons later my etrac gave me a nice low tone which proved to be a lovely little find.

18th Century Silver Jewelled Cufflink Button
A lovely silver jewelled cuff-link button with the link still attached unfortunatley the other button is missing probably causing the loss the the cuff-link from the wearer.

The button is circular with a convex back and a concave front, into which a faceted clear glass stone is set. The metal 'cup' is of composite sheet construction, with a circular-section simple looped wire shank soldered to it. The stone is retained by twelve claws, immediately below which there are circumferential grooves (possibly decorative, but also joints in the composite construction). The link is a cast type with an openwork design.

I do like a nice artifact and this put a great end to the day.

So on what looks set to be the last outing of July Roy has come up trumps again with another hammered coin from on of our potato fields. After several hours of searching Roy came over to show me a rather worn silver hammered coin, there wasnt a great deal of detail left on it but the outline of a shield was clearly visible. At first I had it down as being a sixpence from the reign of Elizabeth 1st but after close inspection and assisted by UKDFD it turned out be be a Groat of Queen Mary. What a great find especially as Mary's coinage seems the be very illusive.

Below is a picture of the coin found on the day followed by a picture of what it would have looked like in its glory..



Queen Mary Groat

 1553-1554
    
Below You can just make out the detail against the Mary groat shown left




Thursday 22 January 2015

Is this your ancestor?

Last year this exquisite gold armorial finger-ring, with seal-matrix bezel incorporating a quality engraving of a family coat of arms, was found on farmland near Chester, Cheshire, England.

Although part of the hoop is missing, the main body is almost pristine with its elaborate engraving sharp and intact.


* It is possible that the “rose” within the shield is a “cinquefoil”, a five-leafed flower.




The ring fragment has been dated by curators at the British Museum, heraldry experts and master engravers as post-Medieval, having been made in the 17th century, possibly before or during the English Civil War period [1642-1651].

The ring is almost certainly 22 carat solid gold, has an oval bezel measuring 21mm by 13.8mm and weighs 6.6 grams. The perimeter has a distinctive, uniformly, dotted border.


The armorial is orientated vertically and depicts a shield containing an engrailed saltire [St. Andrew's cross with scalloped edges] and with a rose (*or cinquefoil) in the upper-centre. 

The rose may be a substantive part of the design of the arms, or it may be a “mark of cadency” a small difference added to the arms of a younger son or the head of a younger line to indicate junior status. 

According to a system widely used in England since the 16th century a rose is used by a seventh son on his arms and crest.

The crest above the shield comprises a knight's helmet with closed grill, on which rests a torpe [wound rope ring] used to secure to the knight's helmet a mantle [a type of cloak]; represented here as elaborate scroll-work on both sides. In the wax seal impression the helmet visor faces left. 




The picture above has been “flipped” and digitally enhanced to indicate the intended orientation of the seal-impression, with the helmet visor now facing left.

Above the helmet, also forming part of the crest, is a vested [gauntlet-clad] forearm and hand clutching an engrailed saltire.

The ring has a practical function – to seal with molten wax important documents, leaving a clear, fixed impression of the owner's personal coat of arms and therefore his identity. 

Close inspection of the top right corner of the cross within the shield (see first photograph)
reveals what is believed to be a minute particle of original sealing wax in-situ.



The composition of the coat of arms, in particular the distinctive elements making-up the crest, is crucially important to establishing the identity of the original gentleman-owner of this fine piece of history.

The provenance of the ring is not yet established but it is certain that the original owner would have been a person of considerable substance, learning and wealth. Heraldic records show that there are a several families that are known to use elements of the armorial in their coat of arms.


For Example:





Family members of Clan Colquhoun [or Cahoon] use the engrailed saltire in their family armorial.

Perhaps significantly, William Colquhoun of Kenmuir, who in the 17th century inherited the Stirling Estates, had the rose 'gules' [red] 'in chief [top centre] of his shield. 


The arms of Stirling of Law comprise both the Kenmuir arms and the Stirling family arms.



Several branches of the distinguished Middleton family have the engrailed saltire as a main element within the shield of their coat of arms. This long-established family have ancestry deeply embedded in England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland and the engrailed saltire is a common feature. 

The Middleton's have roots in Sussex and a number counties bordering Cheshire and North Wales.

Intriguingly, branches of the Irish Patrick family, who also have Scottish ancestral links, have in their armorial the saltire as a prominent feature and importantly, in their crest, a 'cubit' arm and hand grasping a second, smaller saltire.


This short-list of candidates for ownership of the arms is by no means exhaustive and there will be other families who have used the key elements. Is your ancestor a candidate? Our small trusted team of metal detecting enthusiasts, dubbed “Finders-Sharers” is dedicated to the search, discovery and preservation of buried local history. 

We are determined to solve this mystery by identifying the original owner of the ring, through the distinctive coat of arms – and the powerful combination of the internet and social media platforms.

Do you recognize this family coat of arms, in particular the crest?. Maybe it once belonged to one of your ancestors and you have a picture of the original? If so, we would very much like to hear from you.

Further information about the find can be viewed at:




British Museum - Portable Antiquities Scheme

http://finds.org.uk/database/artefacts/record/id/609482

United Kingdom Detector Finds Database ( UKDFD )
http://www.ukdfd.co.uk/ Item 46647

Stephen Plowman's excellent Heraldry website blog
http://www.heraldry-online.org.uk/blog.html

Facebook page of William “Roy” Aldington












Or alternatively please leave a comment in the comments box below. 




Thank you for having interest in solving this conundrum and for taking the time to view the detail.